Page 3 of 4

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 9:59 pm
by finpxz1
bluehens2005 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 8:52 pm
finpxz1 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:13 pm That doesn’t mean anything…coaches get fired all the time with years left on their contract. And Chrissi hasn’t been shy about pulling the trigger.
Don’t you think they are focusing all resources on the transition to c-USA. Not sure we have the money to buy out 5 years worth of contract.
They might just be ok with average.
Here's what I know. 8 years in and we basically have a .500 coach. If the admin is okay with a good guy who runs a clean program and is average, MI is your man. If they are looking for good to great, I'm not convinced we have the right guy running the program. Time will tell I guess?

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2024 11:08 pm
by GVHen87
I hate to start pounding the coach again after pounding Ross and Henderson a lot, but I am getting to that point. Something is just not gelling. The team doesn't seem to play hard enough to play good D. Someone earlier mentioned Riley's lack of scoring, but I can't recall him having an open look all day. The shots he took were all forced - including the bank 3. Can't they run plays to free him up?

And how bout Monroe's dunk with Drexel up a lot with about 2 seconds left? Bush league. Too bad someone didn't give him a forearm on his way to the bucket - but no one seemed to care. I sure hope the Hens remember that the next time they play Drexel.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:42 am
by Hengrad07
finpxz1 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 9:59 pm
bluehens2005 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 8:52 pm
finpxz1 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 7:13 pm That doesn’t mean anything…coaches get fired all the time with years left on their contract. And Chrissi hasn’t been shy about pulling the trigger.
Don’t you think they are focusing all resources on the transition to c-USA. Not sure we have the money to buy out 5 years worth of contract.
They might just be ok with average.
Here's what I know. 8 years in and we basically have a .500 coach. If the admin is okay with a good guy who runs a clean program and is average, MI is your man. If they are looking for good to great, I'm not convinced we have the right guy running the program. Time will tell I guess?
Do other CAA teams have constant transfers to P5 and end up starting for those programs? Not an excuse, just wondering 😬

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:13 am
by finpxz1
For not wanting to make excuses, that sure does sound like one. Admittedly, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I do know that every other Division I coach in the country is playing by the same rules. And some seem to be navigating this new NIL world better than others…even at the mid-major level. Don’t get me wrong, I think Martin is a really good person and a fine representative of the University. I just don’t think he is someone who can elevate this program to the next level. And that’s no easy task BTW…in the history of this program, one could argue that only Coach Brey and possibly Steinwedel have ever been able to do that. So the question once again becomes what’s a priority for the administration??? At a time that it certainly appears elevating all of our programs is very important as we transition to CUSA, we may have our answer either way sooner than later.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:22 am
by jd of de
finpxz1 wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:13 am For not wanting to make excuses, that sure does sound like one. Admittedly, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I do know that every other Division I coach in the country is playing by the same rules. And some seem to be navigating this new NIL world better than others…even at the mid-major level. Don’t get me wrong, I think Martin is a really good person and a fine representative of the University. I just don’t think he is someone who can elevate this program to the next level. And that’s no easy task BTW…in the history of this program, one could argue that only Coach Brey and possibly Steinwedel have ever been able to do that. So the question once again becomes what’s a priority for the administration??? At a time that it certainly appears elevating all of our programs is very important as we transition to CUSA, we may have our answer either way sooner than later.
Respectfully, you’ve made your point bluntly clear, numerous times on this post and I believe the Rider and Princeton threads as well Fin. We know where you stand.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:50 am
by finpxz1
WARNING, WARNING…the gohens message board police have spoken…WARNING, WARNING!!!

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:05 am
by rooneyguy
GVHen87 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 11:08 pm I hate to start pounding the coach again after pounding Ross and Henderson a lot, but I am getting to that point. Something is just not gelling. The team doesn't seem to play hard enough to play good D. Someone earlier mentioned Riley's lack of scoring, but I can't recall him having an open look all day. The shots he took were all forced - including the bank 3. Can't they run plays to free him up?

And how bout Monroe's dunk with Drexel up a lot with about 2 seconds left? Bush league. Too bad someone didn't give him a forearm on his way to the bucket - but no one seemed to care. I sure hope the Hens remember that the next time they play Drexel.
IMHO, I think opponents have scouted Reilly enough to know that he can't/won't drive to the basket and isn't quick enough to get himself open otherwise. That means that one defender can stay on him and basically nullify him as a weapon. I won't mention his defensive liabilities, but it all adds up. I would expect his playing time to decrease from here on out if MI really wants to play a tougher and more physical brand of basketball.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:16 am
by msbny
Reilly appears to be in over his capabilities . Time to sit more and possibly move on next year to a softer landing .

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:18 am
by udsb97
I'll double down on that rooney. His earlier success has led to more defensive attention then he can handle.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:29 am
by Udforever1
msbny wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:16 am Reilly appears to be in over his capabilities . Time to sit more and possibly move on next year to a softer landing .
Calling for a kid to transfer is a bit much after a rough two games. He’s two games removed from scoring in double figures 5 out of 6 games and is currently averaging 10 a game on the season.

Has to be a lot better defensively though.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:41 pm
by allteamball
GVHen87 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 11:08 pm I hate to start pounding the coach again after pounding Ross and Henderson a lot, but I am getting to that point. Something is just not gelling. The team doesn't seem to play hard enough to play good D. Someone earlier mentioned Riley's lack of scoring, but I can't recall him having an open look all day. The shots he took were all forced - including the bank 3. Can't they run plays to free him up?

And how bout Monroe's dunk with Drexel up a lot with about 2 seconds left? Bush league. Too bad someone didn't give him a forearm on his way to the bucket - but no one seemed to care. I sure hope the Hens remember that the next time they play Drexel.
Good post. Like you, I was all for the hiring of Inglesby, but I am now getting to the point that, after 8 seasons, I believe his time running this program has past. He has been given every opportunity. He has not been able to energize the fanbase or elevate this program to any large extent. My gosh, his conference record around 45% after 8 years is not good enough! It pains me to say this because I have met him a few times and he is a great guy.

You are also right about D where his kids are not held accountable to play hard defense throughout the game. He rarely plays any type of pressure defenses. Watch other teams like UCONN who play “in your face” defense the entire game. That is due to a great coach holding his kids responsible.

Why should Delaware basketball be held to a different standard of excellence than football?

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 1:33 pm
by gonzo
Davis and Drumgoole took 36 shots yesterday and made only 14 for a 38% FG percentage

The rest of team shot 12-24 50%

Looks like it's back to the two man show they had last year. It's not pretty and it's not efficient.

The Blue Hens desperately need a lead point guard who can get the entire offense involved.

Ingelsby must add a defensive big and a true PG next year or we're looking at another 17-20 win season and a 5th or 6th seed. Middle of the pack.

Delaware is a mid mid major.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:11 pm
by jd of de
I asked respectfully and you have to go and do that. Me part of the GoHens police? :lol: :lol: Nah, I just don’t wanna see you run off anymore of the knowledgeable basketball fans than you already have. I do miss Dave B’s posts.

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:30 pm
by finpxz1
sure thing, JD...just for you I'll stop posting my opinions on a MESSAGE BOARD. Dave's a big boy and I'm sure doesn't need your help defending anything he posts. If it makes you feel better, I am officially taking a 180 on coach Ingelsby. I am 100% on board and think the program is in terrific hands...Go Hens!!!

Re: Drexel

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 5:00 pm
by jd of de
Keep posting all you’d like fin. I admit when every post says the same thing, it does require less thought and effort.